The Federal Court, Brisbane has found that Darryl Jones, principal of the Darryl Jones Health Resolution Centre, engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to certain cancer prevention and treatment claims.
The representations were contained on the Darryl Jones Health Resolution Centre website (www.darryljoneshealth.com.au) and in an electronic book written by Mr Jones and sold through that site entitled The Truth About Overcoming Cancer.
Some of the claims included that the treatments offered by Mr Jones:
Mr Jones’ treatment program included reducing or eliminating glucose from the diet and ingesting high levels of Laetrile (also known as Amygdalin) that is sourced in such foodstuffs as apricot kernels.
The program cost $2,900 for the first three months and $1,500 for every three months thereafter.
The court found that Mr Jones’ claims were untrue, that he had no reasonable basis for making the representations and possessed no reliable current scientific evidence or expert medical opinion to support them.
According to an expert oncologist engaged by the ACCC, whose evidence was accepted by the court, taking high levels of Laetrile can result in cyanide toxicity and glucose elimination can cause weight loss and imbalanced metabolism.
Justice Logan made final orders which included:
In his judgment, Justice Logan found that: “the nature of the proven contraventions and the public interest tells decisively in favour of the granting of injunctive relief” and that such broad relief was appropriate as “Anything less would not offer adequate protection to the public in general and those suffering from or whose loved ones are suffering from cancer.”
ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said the ACCC acted in the public interest to protect vulnerable people who are fighting serious or terminal illnesses.
“The treatment promoted by Mr Jones was not only without a reliable current scientific or medical basis, but it was potentially dangerous as well. The ACCC urges anyone suffering from cancer to seek advice from a suitably qualified medical practitioner.
“The ACCC could not seek penalties in this case as the conduct occurred prior to the introduction of the civil penalty regime which began in April 2010,” he said.
On 1 January 2011 as part of Australian Consumer Law amendments the Trade Practices Act 1974 was renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
Topics: 2011, Amygdalin, apricot, Australia, Brisbane, cancer prevention, Competition and Consumer Act 2010, cyanide toxicity, Darryl Jones, Darryl Jones Health Resolution Centre, deceptive, diet, federal court, glucose, glucose elimination, Governance, government, health care, Health Care, judgment, Justice Logan, Laetrile, medical opinion, misleading, moniter, monitor, news, nutrition, oncologist, scientific evidence, terminal illness, The Truth About Overcoming Cancer, Trade Practices Act 1974, treatment, website
Print This Article in Plain Text
|
|